Introduction
The genetic background of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) associated vasculitis (AAV) is recognised as relevant for the disease pathogenesis.1 Evidence from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) has contributed decisively to question the original concept of clinical phenotypes in AAV.2–4 Patients are customarily classified according to shared clinical and histopathological features into granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.5 However, over the last decade, studies have shown that clinical outcomes separate more clearly when patients are classified according with ANCA specificity into antiproteinase 3 (PR3)-AAV and antimyeloperoxidase (MPO)-AAV.5–7
GWAS in AAV demonstrates that PR3-AAV and MPO-AAV have different genetic risk associations.2–4 PR3-AAV is associated with the HLA-DPB1*04:01 which is related with the presentation of PR3 antigen to the immune system.2 3 8 Furthermore, the balance between α1-antitrypsin (SERPINA1) and PR3 (PRTN3) gene expression influences PR3 levels.2 3 In PR3-AAV, the role of PRTN3 gene polymorphisms has been previously studied.9 Eight single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) have been identified.9 The SNP in the promoter region might affect a putative transcription factor binding site, whereas the role of SNP in exonic sequences has not been defined.9 10 However, the actual frequency of PRTN3 polymorphisms in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) is not well characterised. The SNP rs351111 (chr.19:844020) has a minor allelic frequency between 0.497 and 0.322 and results in a nucleotide change from G to A in the position 355 (c.355G>A) in the PRTN3 gene.10 This change leads to a missense protein with an amino-acid change from Valine to Isoleucine in the position 119 of the PR3 protein (Val119Ile) and amino-acid numbering based on National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nomenclature.10 This variant has been previously described in PR3-AAV, and the allelic frequency of the variant was 35.3% vs 64.7% when compared with the wild type, and this was not different when compared with controls.10 The homozygous variants of the PRTN3 gene polymorphism (SNP rs351111) result in uniquely different proteins in affected patients. These different PR3 proteins could interact differently with potentially pathogenic PR3-ANCA. Therefore, we hypothesise that the PRTN3 gene polymorphism (SNP rs351111) might impact clinical outcomes.
This study aimed to (i) characterise the frequency of the SNP rs351111 and (ii) determine the association of the polymorphic conformation with disease presentation, clinical phenotypes and clinical outcomes such as relapse rate and severity of the disease in a very well-characterised clinical trial cohort.